![]() The first two petitions, as many may be aware, failed because, in part, the Court did not find Walz acted contrary to substantive, legal precedent. Yesterday, courageous Minnesotans submitted a third proposed petition to recall Walz. After the recall petition was submitted, the group made the following statement: ![]() The recall effort criticized Walz of breaking multiple state statutes over shelter-in-place rules instituted to stop the spread of coronavirus. Ī third recall petition was introduced in September 2020 against Gov. She said that the recall effort did not meet the legal standards to recall an elected official. On August 13, 2020, Chief Justice Lorie Gildea dismissed the recall effort. Taken as a whole, Walz's knowing and intentional conduct rises to the level of serious malfeasance of office warranting his recall. Both Petitioners have suffered economic harm by the continuing and wrongful forced shuttering of their businesses. Similarly, on or about May 15, Petitioner Royce desired to open his gym by calling his employees back to work, but was prevented from doing so due to his reasonable fear of Governor Walz's penalties established in Walz's Executive Order. More specifically, on or about May 13, 2020, Petitioner Mergen desired to open his restaurant by calling his employees back to work, but was prevented from doing so due to his reasonable fear of Governor Walz's penalties established in Walz's Executive Order. Walz's actions specifically show a knowing, intentional, and substantial infringement on constitutional rights to due process of law and just compensation paid and secured before damage or destruction of private property for public good. Many businesses, including Shady's Bars and Restaurants, and Title Boxing, remained closed due to the fear of the "up to one year in prison" penalty that Walz's newly conceived "crime" carried. Furthermore, Walz violated the non-delegation doctrine of the State Constitution by creating new crimes and penalties when he deemed it a gross misdemeanor for owners or supervisors to encourage employees to participate in the reopening of businesses. ![]() Walz then substantially infringed on the constitutional rights of many Minnesotans by issuing executive orders, with the purported force of law afforded during a Peacetime Emergency, infringing upon peaceful assembly and the free expression of religion as demonstrated by the mayor of New Brighton threatening church attendees with arrest and citing the executive orders as her underlying authority. Walz acted illegally and substantially outside the scope of the governor's authority when he declared a Peacetime Emergency by classifying COVID-19 as an "Act of Nature". We hereby petition for the recall of Governor Tim Walz due to the intentional misuse of his executive authority constituting serious malfeasance of office. The petition listed the following reasons for recall: Ī second recall petition was introduced in July 2020 against Gov. Chief Justice Lorie Gildea wrote that the recall petition did not meet the legal standards to recall an elected official. On June 15, 2020, the supreme court dismissed the recall petition. ![]() The recall petition was sent to the Minnesota Supreme Court for review. Petition dismissed by the Minnesota Supreme Court Further, we will prove he is guilty of Malfeasance, as defined in MN Statute, Chapter 211: “Malfeasance" means the intentional commission of an unlawful or wrongful act … in the performance of the officer's duties that is substantially outside the scope of the authority of the officer and that substantially infringes on the rights of any person or entity. As we will prove in our Recall Case, Walz went beyond the scope of his emergency powers in doing so. Governor Walz and his fear-mongering accomplices took advantage of the COVID-19 situation to enact broad, arbitrary, and damaging orders that have quickly proven to be a cure worse than the disease. The recall website listed the following reasons for recall: The Recall Tim Walz group filed the recall on May 21, 2020. Recall supporters First recall effort (ended) 1.3.1 Petition dismissed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.1.2.1 Petition dismissed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.1.1.1 Petition dismissed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |